The Honorable Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts Post Office Box 13528 Austin, Texas 78711-3528
Re: Whether the Comptroller's report required by Tax Code sections
Dear Comptroller Combs:
In 2001, the Legislature adopted the Texas Economic Development Act (the "Act"). See Act of May 24, 2001, 77th Leg., R.S., ch.
In 2007, the Legislature enacted legislation that, in relevant part, requires the Office of the Comptroller of Public Accounts (the "Comptroller") to prepare a biennial report1 for the Legislature regarding the progress of value limitation agreements entered into pursuant to the Act. See Act of May 25, 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., ch.
You ask the following questions about this report:
1) Whether the Comptroller's report is limited to the 11 items listed in Sections 313.008(a) and 313.032(a)?
2) Whether the Comptroller may use in the report information provided by recipients of limitation on appraised value agreements, regardless of whether the information was marked as confidential by the recipients?
Request Letter at 1.
I. Applicable Law
Your questions raise issues of statutory construction. In construing a statute, we must ascertain the Legislature's intent in enacting the statute. State v. Shurnake,Your questions also involve determinations regarding the Comptroller's powers. While the Texas Constitution defines some of the Comptroller's functions and duties, much of the Comptroller's authority is specified by the Legislature. See TEX. CONST, art.
II. Analysis
Neither section 313.008 nor 313.032, which contain the required content of the report, expressly indicate that the list of eleven items is intended to be exclusive in nature. And we find nothing in the legislative history suggesting that the list is intended to be exclusive. Insofar as the list of items in sections 313.008 and 313.032 does not provide the information necessary for the Comptroller to prepare "a report assessing the progress of each agreement," we conclude the Comptroller may include in the report additional information that is reasonably necessary to fulfill the Comptroller's statutory obligation of preparing such a report. See Bullock,In sum, because of the lack of any limiting language in sections 313.008 and 313.032 and the Comptroller's implied authority, we conclude that the Comptroller is not precluded from including more information in the report than is required by sections 313.008 and 313.032. This additional information must, however, be reasonably necessary to fulfill the Comptroller's statutory obligation of providing a report that assesses the progress of limitation agreements under the Act. See id. And in no instance may the report include "information that is confidential by law" as expressly prohibited by sections 313.008 and 313.032. See
Tex. Tax Code Ann. §§
The statutory prohibition against the inclusion of confidential information in the report brings us to your second question — "[w]hether the Comptroller may use in the report information provided by recipients of limitation on appraised value agreements" if those recipients marked'the information as confidential. Request Letter at 1. Sections 313.008(b) and 313.032(b) prohibit the Comptroller from including in the report information that is confidential by law, not information that is marked
as confidential by a recipient of a limitation. Tex. Tax Code Ann. §§
In preparing the report on limitation agreements under the Texas Economic Development Act, the Comptroller of Public Accounts may include more information than is required by sections313.008 and313.032 of the Tax Code if the information is reasonably necessary to assess the progress of such agreements.The Comptroller may use in the report information provided by recipients of limitations, regardless of whether the information is marked as confidential by the recipients, so long as the information is not confidential by law. The Comptroller must, in the first instance, determine whether information is confidential by law.
Very truly yours,
GREG ABBOTT Attorney General of Texas
ANDREW WEBER First Assistant Attorney General
JONATHAN K. FRELS Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel
NANCY S. FULLER Chair, Opinion Committee
Christy Drake-Adams Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee
