History
  • No items yet
midpage
National Labor Relations Board v. Production Plating Company
614 F.2d 1117
| 6th Cir. | 1980
|
Check Treatment

614 F.2d 1117

104 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2661, 89 Lab.Cas. P 12,136

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
PRODUCTION PLATING COMPANY, Respondent.

No. 78-1041.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 19, 1980.

Elliott Moore, William Wachter, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Jay Shanklin, Wyneva Johnson, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., Emil Farkas, Director, Region 9, N. L. R. B., Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner.

Robert F. Houlihan, Lexington, Ky., Joseph A. Yocum, Evansville, Ind., for respondent.

Before EDWARDS, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and PECK, Senior Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order reported at 233 NLRB No. 25. The Board's order was based upon findings that the company had violated the National Labor Relations Act by illegal surveillance and coercion designed to prevent free exercise of employee rights to engage in collective bargaining and by discharging three employees because of union activities.

2

After review of the briefs and record, this court concludes that the findings of the Board are based upon substantial evidence upon the whole record and that the bargaining order is appropriate under the principles enunciated in NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co., Inc., 395 U.S. 575, 89 S. Ct. 1918, 23 L. Ed. 2d 547 (1969). Wherefore the enforcement is granted as prayed for.

Case Details

Case Name: National Labor Relations Board v. Production Plating Company
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 19, 1980
Citation: 614 F.2d 1117
Docket Number: 78-1041
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.