History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bright v. . Wilson
1 N.C. 251
| N.C. | 1800
|
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

I am of opinion that the judgment of the county court should be affirmed.






Addendum

No special errors are assigned in this case, and I have not, upon a view of the record, been able to discern any; the writ in its substantial parts is conformable to the precedent in the register, and though the judgment does not appear to be rendered according to 6 Ed. 1, for the place wasted, yet that omission being for the defendant's benefit, was not, I presume, intended to be assigned. *Page 217






Addendum

I am also of opinion that the judgment of the county court should be affirmed.

Judgment for defendants in error.

Cited: Dozier v. Gregory, 46 N.C. 104.

NOTE. — See Ballentine v. Poyner, 3 N.C. 110, and the cases referred to in the note.

Case Details

Case Name: Bright v. . Wilson
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jul 5, 1800
Citation: 1 N.C. 251
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.