History
  • No items yet
midpage
Stanly v. . Cummins
1 N.C. 21
| Sup. Ct. N.C. | 1789
|
Check Treatment

WILLIAMS, J., said it was simply a demand for so much money. said the jury were sworn to ascertain the damages sustained, and they might consider the difference in the value of money.

The other Judges assented, but without charging the jury.

All the Judges present.

NOTE. — Such a note would not be negotiable. See Hodges v.Clinton, post, 53, and the cases there referred to in the note.

(22)

Case Details

Case Name: Stanly v. . Cummins
Court Name: Superior Court of North Carolina
Date Published: May 5, 1789
Citation: 1 N.C. 21
Court Abbreviation: Sup. Ct. N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.