History
  • No items yet
midpage
Merritt's v. . Merritt
1 N.C. 17
| Sup. Ct. N.C. | 1789
|
Check Treatment

after this case had been twice argued. — The plaintiff may proceed for her damages and costs, notwithstanding the negro has been restored to her — and judgment for costs.

NOTE. — Morgan v. Cone, 18 N.C. 234, expressly overrules this case, and decides that if, after action brought and issue joined, the plaintiff gets possession of the thing sued for, that fact may be pleadedpuis darrein continuance, in abatement of the suit, but it seems that it would not be a good plea in bar. See, also, Merritt v. Warmouth, 2 N.C. 12;Flowers v. Glasgow, ibid., 122; and Sheppard v. Edwards, 3 N.C. 186.

Cited: Morgan v. Cone, 18 N.C. 237.

Case Details

Case Name: Merritt's v. . Merritt
Court Name: Superior Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Apr 5, 1789
Citation: 1 N.C. 17
Court Abbreviation: Sup. Ct. N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.