History
  • No items yet
midpage
Campbell v. . Hester
1 N.C. 178
| Sup. Ct. N.C. | 1800
|
Check Treatment

It would be establishing a very bad precedent to suffer this plea to be added, after so long a delay has taken place in this cause. But whatever inclination I might have to permit the addition on the grounds that have been stated, the case cited from 2 Wils. is too strong to be resisted; there the addition of the statute of limitations was denied, because it was not a plea to the merits. The plea now (180) offered is exposed to that as well as to this further objection, that the Act of 1715 contains no exceptions as to infants, feme coverts, etc., differing in this respect from all other acts of limitations. As this act therefore would bar all persons upon whose demands the time had run, whatever disabilities they might be under, arguments against the plea of the statute apply a fortiori to this case.

Motion denied.*

NOTE. — The plea of the statute of limitations may be pleaded after issue joined, upon payment of full costs under peculiar circumstances. Reid v. Hester, post, 603; Johnston v. Williams, post, 628;Hamilton v. Shepard, 4 N.C. 357, 471.

* Vide Bos. and Buller's Rep.

Case Details

Case Name: Campbell v. . Hester
Court Name: Superior Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jul 5, 1800
Citation: 1 N.C. 178
Court Abbreviation: Sup. Ct. N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.