History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mitchell v. . Clarke
1 N.C. 29
| Sup. Ct. N.C. | 1791
|
Check Treatment

Motion by Iredell for plaintiff to prove work and labor done, not by the plaintiff himself, but by negroes which he employed: and goods, etc., sold and delivered for the use of the defendant, by sundry persons and paid for by the plaintiff, under the book debt act.* (30)

Objected by Mr. Attorney-General Moore, that this is neither within the spirit nor letter of the act, because the work was not done by the plaintiff himself, etc.

But, on a long time taken up in discussing the subject, the Court overruled the objection, and admitted the plaintiff to swear.

Case Details

Case Name: Mitchell v. . Clarke
Court Name: Superior Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jul 5, 1791
Citation: 1 N.C. 29
Court Abbreviation: Sup. Ct. N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.