History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. . Dickenson
7 N.C. 10
| N.C. | 1819
|
Check Treatment

The word fine might well be left out, if it obscured or confounded the sense of the scire facias; and it would then read " eight hundred pounds *Page 15 on a forfeited recognizance." But if the word be retained, it is not possible for the defendant to misapprehend (11) the purport of the scire facias, because the meaning intended to be affixed to the word, is explained by what follows. When the state exhibits the record shewing that the defendant's recognizance was forfeited, the fact affirmed in the scire facias is substantially proved, and the plea of nul tiel record, negatived — Let judgment be entered for the State.

Cited: S. v. Raiford, 13 N.C. 216.

(12)

Case Details

Case Name: State v. . Dickenson
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jan 5, 1819
Citation: 7 N.C. 10
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.