The undersigned have reviewed the record and the prior Decision and Order filed by Deputy Commissioner Berger. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, or amend the Decision and Order.
2. On or about 14 March 1995 plaintiff was incarcerated at Cabarrus Correctional Institution. Plaintiff worked on work release.
3. On or about 14 March 1995, plaintiff learned that some real estate property he owned had been vandalized. Furthermore, he was notified by the City of Concord that he would face criminal prosecution if his grass was not cut at this property.
4. Plaintiff filed a request to send money to his friend Mary Clowney. This request was denied.
5. Plaintiff was then instructed by Department of Correction Officer Threat how to send money outside the prison for property repairs. Plaintiff would have been authorized to send money to a contractor with a bill or a voucher.
6. For the type of payment plaintiff desired, the Department of Corrections required an invoice or special permission for any payment over $300.00.
7. Any confusion on plaintiffs part regarding this process did not result from any negligence by any employee of defendant.
8. Plaintiff did not present any evidence of any breach of duty resulting in damage to plaintiff.
9. Plaintiff presented no evidence as to the value of any damage.
2. Plaintiff failed to present any evidence of damages.
2. Each side shall bear its own costs.
This is the ___ day of March, 2001.
S/_______________ CHRISTOPHER SCOTT COMMISSIONER
CONCURRING:
S/______________________ LAURA KRANIFELD MAVRETIC COMMISSIONER
S/___________________ BERNADINE S. BALLANCE COMMISSIONER
