History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dry v. E. J. Snyder Company, Incorporated
I.C. No. 221319
| N.C. Indus. Comm. | Dec 15, 1994
|
Check Treatment

The undersigned have reviewed the Order as well as the Form 44 and the statement submitted by plaintiff and have entertained oral argument in the matter. Plaintiff contends in his Form 44 as well as in his oral argument that he never received notice of the initial hearing and thus this was the reasonable cause of his failure to appear.

The undersigned find his explanation reasonable, credible, and convincing, and are of the opinion that the June 17 1994, order of dismissal should be, and is HEREBY VACATED.

Accordingly, the case is HEREBY REMANDED to the Deputy Commissioner hearing docket for initial hearing on the merits and presentation of evidence before a Deputy Commissioner.

This the _____ day of ___________________________, 1993.

S/ ________________________ J. HOWARD BUNN, JR. CHAIRMAN

CONCURRING:

S/ ________________________ SCOTT M. TAYLOR DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

S/ ________________________ J. RANDOLPH WARD COMMISSIONER

JHB/nwm 11/23/94

Case Details

Case Name: Dry v. E. J. Snyder Company, Incorporated
Court Name: North Carolina Industrial Commission
Date Published: Dec 15, 1994
Docket Number: I.C. No. 221319
Court Abbreviation: N.C. Indus. Comm.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.