History
  • No items yet
midpage
Matter of Desalvo v. Murray
188 N.E. 70
| NY | 1933
|
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

*574no opinion.






Lead Opinion

Order in each proceeding affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: POUND, Ch. J., LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN and CROUCH, JJ. CRANE, J., dissents on the ground that there should have been an alternative order of mandamus granted. Not sitting: HUBBS, J.






Concurrence Opinion

Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Crouch, JJ. Crane, J., dissents on the ground that there should have been an alternative order of mandamus granted. Not sitting: Hubbs, J.

Case Details

Case Name: Matter of Desalvo v. Murray
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jul 11, 1933
Citation: 188 N.E. 70
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.