History
  • No items yet
midpage
Evans v. . Millard
16 N.Y. 619
| NY | 1858
|
Check Treatment

It is entirely clear that this appeal cannot be sustained. It is not an appeal from a judgment, but from an order. It therefore is not embraced by the first subdivision of section eleven of the Code. The order does not in *Page 620 effect determine the action; on the contrary, it allows the action to proceed, without professing to touch, by decision, the merits. The second subdivision, therefore, does not reach it. Nor is it a final order, affecting a substantial right, made upon a summary application in an action after judgment under the third subdivision. It is not final, but directs a new trial.

The appeal must therefore be dismissed.

All the judges concurring,

Appeal dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Evans v. . Millard
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 5, 1858
Citation: 16 N.Y. 619
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.