History
  • No items yet
midpage
Construction v. National Labor Relations Board
590 F.2d 316
| 9th Cir. | 1979
|
Check Treatment

590 F.2d 316

100 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2689, 85 Lab.Cas. P 11,158

CONSTRUCTION, BUILDING MATERIALS AND MISCELLANEOUS DRIVERS,
LOCAL NO. 83, affiliated with the International
Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs,
Warehousemen and Helpers of
America, Petitioner,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.

No. 78-1081.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 29, 1979.

Michael J. Keenan, Phoenix, Ariz., for petitioner.

Jesse I. Etelson, Atty., Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Petition to Review a Decision of the National Labor Relations Board and Cross-Application of the National Labor Relations Board for Enforcement of its Order.

Before ELY, TRASK and HUG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The Decision and Order of the Board is reported at 233 NLRB No. 82.

2

The underlying facts giving rise to the controversy are carefully explored in the decision of Administrative Law Judge Jenson. In our opinion, there was more than ample evidence to support the conclusion that the Union illegally discriminated against its involved member, violating § 8(a)(3) of the Act, and thus engaged in grossly unfair labor practices, as to the involved employee, within the meaning of § 8(b)(1)(A) and (2) and § 2(6) and (7) of the Act. Accordingly, we reject the contentions made by the Union in its Petition to Review and grant the Board's Cross-Application for the enforcement of its Order. The Board's Order will, by this Court, be

3

ENFORCED.

Case Details

Case Name: Construction v. National Labor Relations Board
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Jan 29, 1979
Citation: 590 F.2d 316
Docket Number: 78-1081
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.