History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re the Probate of the Will of Whipple
294 N.Y. 292
| NY | 1945
|
Check Treatment

It was within the power of the Appellate Division, in the exercise of its discretion, to reverse the decree of the Surrogate upon the ground that, in its opinion, the verdict was contrary to and against the clear weight of the evidence. The Appellate Division was without power, however, to direct a contrary verdict in view of the fact that the evidence was not wholly insufficient in point of law to sustain the jury's verdict. (See Blum v. Fresh Grown Preserve Corp., 292 N.Y. 241,245-246.)

The order of the Appellate Division and the decree of the Surrogate's Court should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs in this court to abide the event.

LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, THACHER and DYE, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly. *Page 295

Case Details

Case Name: In Re the Probate of the Will of Whipple
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 24, 1945
Citation: 294 N.Y. 292
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.