History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Rabenold
287 N.Y. 832
| NY | 1942
|
Check Treatment

Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: FINCH, LEWIS, CONWAY and DESMOND, JJ. LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN and RIPPEY, JJ., dissent on the ground that sections 304 and 889 of the Penal Law cannot be stretched to cover the acts here charged against the defendant.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Rabenold
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 5, 1942
Citation: 287 N.Y. 832
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.