History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ciccolini v. Vocafilm Corp. of America
171 N.E. 794
| NY | 1930
|
Check Treatment

The Appellate Division had authority to reverse the judgment as a matter of discretion. It did not exercise that power, however, but reversed as a matter of law. No error of law was involved. We are, therefore, compelled to reverse. The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the judgment of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division.

CARDOZO, Ch. J. POUND, CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN and HUBBS, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.

Case Details

Case Name: Ciccolini v. Vocafilm Corp. of America
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 6, 1930
Citation: 171 N.E. 794
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.