History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. L. Dale Rohl
588 F.2d 296
| 9th Cir. | 1978
|
Check Treatment

588 F.2d 296

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
L. Dale ROHL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 78-2837.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 15, 1978.

Marc D. Blackman, Asst. U.S. Atty., Portland, Or., for plaintiff-appellee.

Norman Sepenuk, Portland, Or., for defendant-appellant.

ORDER

Before BROWNING and TRASK, Circuit Judges.

Upon due consideration of appellant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel, Norman Sepenuk, Esq., will be appointed counsel by a separate order. 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(c). Appellant is therefore entitled to obtain a transcript of the record on appeal prepared at government expense. 28 U.S.C. § 753(f).

Counsel Sepenuk's request to associate with James Coon, Esq., on this appeal is granted. However, total compensation for all counsel shall not exceed the amount payable if only one attorney had been appointed. Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights of the Senate Comm. on the Judiciary, 90th Cong., 2d Sess., The Criminal Justice Act in the Federal District Courts 189-90 (Comm. Print 1969).

1

Appellant and counsel are advised that there is a continuing obligation to inform this court of any changes in appellant's financial status. 9th Cir. R. Appendix § 8(a).

2

Counsel is granted a 45-day extension of time in which to file an opening brief.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. L. Dale Rohl
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Dec 15, 1978
Citation: 588 F.2d 296
Docket Number: 78-2837
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.