History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gannett v. . Schenectady Railway Company
184 N.Y. 598
| NY | 1906
|
Check Treatment

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event, on the ground that the question of plaintiff's contributory negligence was one of fact for the jury; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., EDWARD T. BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN and WILLARD BARTLETT, JJ. Dissenting: GRAY, J. Not sitting: CHASE, J. *Page 599

Case Details

Case Name: Gannett v. . Schenectady Railway Company
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 6, 1906
Citation: 184 N.Y. 598
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.