History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gannett v. . Schenectady Railway Company
184 N.Y. 598
NY
1906
Check Treatment

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event, on the ground that the question of plaintiff's contributory negligence was one of fact for the jury; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., EDWARD T. BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN and WILLARD BARTLETT, JJ. Dissenting: GRAY, J. Not sitting: CHASE, J. *Page 599

Case Details

Case Name: Gannett v. . Schenectady Railway Company
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 6, 1906
Citation: 184 N.Y. 598
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.