History
  • No items yet
midpage
Corcoran v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
164 N.Y. 587
| NY | 1900
|
Check Treatment

Judgment affirmed, with costs. The question whether the statute is violative of the provisions of the Constitution has not been considered for the reason that the question was not raised in the courts below (Purdy v. Erie R.R. Co., 162 N.Y. 42); no opinion.

Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN and LANDON, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Corcoran v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 26, 1900
Citation: 164 N.Y. 587
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.