History
  • No items yet
midpage
Matter of Ehrlich v. Kern
284 N.Y. 778
| NY | 1940
|
Check Treatment

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: FINCH, RIPPEY, SEARS, LEWIS and CONWAY, JJ. LEHMAN, Ch. J., and LOUGHRAN, J., dissent on the ground that the appointments in this case were not temporary appointments within the meaning of the Civil Service Law. *Page 780

Case Details

Case Name: Matter of Ehrlich v. Kern
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 31, 1940
Citation: 284 N.Y. 778
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.