Matter of Ehrlich v. Kern
284 N.Y. 778
NY1940Check TreatmentOrder affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: FINCH, RIPPEY, SEARS, LEWIS and CONWAY, JJ. LEHMAN, Ch. J., and LOUGHRAN, J., dissent on the ground that the appointments in this case were not temporary appointments within the meaning of the Civil Service Law. *Page 780