History
  • No items yet
midpage
U.T. Hungerford Brass and Copper Company v. . Hines
142 N.E. 270
| NY | 1923
|
Check Treatment

Order affirming order denying motion to vacate service of summons affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative. Order affirming order granting motion to amend summons affirmed, without costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative; no opinion.

Concur: HOGAN, CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ. Not voting: HISCOCK, Ch. J.

Case Details

Case Name: U.T. Hungerford Brass and Copper Company v. . Hines
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 8, 1923
Citation: 142 N.E. 270
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.