History
  • No items yet
midpage
Di Tommaso v. . Syracuse University
112 N.E. 1072
NY
1916
Check Treatment

Order affirmed, with costs; first and second questions certified answered in the negative; remaining questions not answered; no opinion.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, COLLIN, SEABURY and POUND, JJ. Dissenting: CUDDEBACK and HOGAN, JJ. *Page 642

Case Details

Case Name: Di Tommaso v. . Syracuse University
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 2, 1916
Citation: 112 N.E. 1072
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.