History
  • No items yet
midpage
Baumann v. Stetten, Baumann
180 N.E. 353
| NY | 1932
|
Check Treatment

Motion by plaintiff for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements.

Motions to amend remittitur granted to the following extent; return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended, first, so as to provide that the respondents Berenice L. Baumann, Elizabeth Baumann and Charles Baumann are not entitled to costs at the Appellate Division as against the defendants Stetten and Greenbaum; and, second, so as to provide that the matter of compensation of the special guardian be remitted to the Special Term there to be dealt with as that court may be advised. (See 257 N.Y. 480.)

Case Details

Case Name: Baumann v. Stetten, Baumann
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 16, 1932
Citation: 180 N.E. 353
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.