History
  • No items yet
midpage
McCowan v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company
188 N.E. 68
| NY | 1933
|
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

Judgment in each action affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG and CROUCH, JJ. POUND, Ch. J., and O'BRIEN, J., dissent on the authority of Crough v. NewYork Central Railroad Company (260 N.Y. 227, 231). Not sitting: HUBBS, J. *Page 571






Lead Opinion

no opinion.






Concurrence Opinion

Concur: Crane, Lehman, Kellogg and Crouch, JJ. Pound, Ch. J., and O’Brien, J., dissent on the authority of Crough v. New York Central Railroad Company (260 N. Y. 227, 231). Not sitting: Hubbs, J.

Case Details

Case Name: McCowan v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jul 11, 1933
Citation: 188 N.E. 68
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.