History
  • No items yet
midpage
Clearwater v. . Brill
63 N.Y. 627
| NY | 1875
|
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

FOLGER, J., reads for reversal and new trial; ALLEN, MILLER and EARL, JJ., concur.

CHURCH, Ch. J., and ANDREWS, J., concur in result on the ground that defendant's attachment was valid; with this EARL, J., also concurs.

Judgment reversed.






Lead Opinion

Foloer, J.,

reads for reversal and new trial; Allen, Miller and Earl, JJ., concur.






Concurrence Opinion

Church, Oh. J., and Andrews, J.,

concur in result on the ground that defendant’s attachment was valid; with this Earl, J., also concurs.

J udgment reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: Clearwater v. . Brill
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 30, 1875
Citation: 63 N.Y. 627
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.