City of Corning v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
108 N.E. 1091
| NY | 1915
|
Check Treatment
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. *Page 645
Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, CHASE, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN and MILLER, JJ. Dissenting: SEABURY, J., on the ground that the entire structure between the two stone abutments constituted the framework of the bridge within the meaning of the statute.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
