History
  • No items yet
midpage
Matter of Farley v. . Sage
112 N.E. 1058
NY
1916
Check Treatment

Order affirmed, with costs. The errors in the admission of evidence are disregarded as not affecting the substantial rights of the defendants (Code Civ. Pro. § 1317); no opinion.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., CHASE, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, SEABURY and POUND, JJ. Dissenting: CARDOZO, J.

Case Details

Case Name: Matter of Farley v. . Sage
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 14, 1916
Citation: 112 N.E. 1058
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.