History
  • No items yet
midpage
Deyo v. . Rutland Railroad Company
235 N.Y. 543
| NY | 1923
|
Check Treatment

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., HOGAN, CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN and CRANE, JJ. Absent: ANDREWS, J.

Case Details

Case Name: Deyo v. . Rutland Railroad Company
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 27, 1923
Citation: 235 N.Y. 543
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.