History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sweeny v. Wait
188 N.E. 67
| NY | 1933
|
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

(See 261 N.Y. 690; 262 N.Y. 521.)

Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and judgment of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division. No opinion.

Concur: POUND, Ch. J., KELLOGG, O'BRIEN and HUBBS, JJ. CRANE, LEHMAN and CROUCH, JJ., dissent and vote to modify the judgment of the Appellate Division by granting a new trial. *Page 567






Lead Opinion

No opinion.






Concurrence Opinion

Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ. Crane, Lehman and Crouch, JJ., dissent and vote to modify the judgment of the Appellate Division by granting a new trial.

Case Details

Case Name: Sweeny v. Wait
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jul 11, 1933
Citation: 188 N.E. 67
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.