History
  • No items yet
midpage
Zuco v. Funt
292 N.Y. 201
| NY | 1944
|
Check Treatment

The evidence presented an issue of fact as to whether, in the construction of the building in which the plaintiff Rosario Zuco was injured, the proximate cause of his injuries was the defendants' failure to perform a statutory duty (Labor Law, § 241, subd. 4) which required them thoroughly to plank over steel beams on which structural steel work was being erected above the place where the plaintiff was working. (See Lyles v. Terry Tench Co., 227 N.Y. 361, 363-365.) Upon this record we cannot say, as did the Appellate Division (266 App. Div. 802), that the testimony of the witness Marino was incredible as a matter of law.

The judgments should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.

LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, RIPPEY, LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND and THACHER, JJ. concur.

Judgments reversed, etc.

*Page 204

Case Details

Case Name: Zuco v. Funt
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 2, 1944
Citation: 292 N.Y. 201
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.