History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gropp v. . the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company
205 N.Y. 617
NY
1912
Check Treatment

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event, on the ground that the amendment of the complaint allowed by the trial court introduced a new and different cause of action, as to which this court concurs in the dissenting opinion of INGRAHAM, P.J., below; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., HAIGHT, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK, CHASE and COLLIN, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Gropp v. . the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 4, 1912
Citation: 205 N.Y. 617
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.