History
  • No items yet
midpage
Matter of Tuomey v. Cohen
296 N.Y. 628
NY
1946
Check Treatment

MEMORANDUM: Some of the judges are of opinion that the appellant Ambro validly complied with section 335 of the Election Law but that view does not have the support of a majority of the court. Since the Appellate Division's order of modification was made on the law alone, we lack the power to review the facts (Civ. Prac. Act, § 602). Hence, the order is affirmed, without costs. No opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND and FULD, JJ. Taking no part: THACHER and DYE, JJ. *Page 630

Case Details

Case Name: Matter of Tuomey v. Cohen
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Aug 17, 1946
Citation: 296 N.Y. 628
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.