History
  • No items yet
midpage
Barber v. Jewel Tea Co., Inc.
16 N.E.2d 94
| NY | 1938
|
Check Treatment

In each action: judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HUBBS, LOUGHRAN, FINCH and RIPPEY, JJ. Dissenting as to Jewel Tea Co., Inc.: LEHMAN and O'BRIEN, JJ. Taking no part: CRANE, Ch. J. *Page 542

Case Details

Case Name: Barber v. Jewel Tea Co., Inc.
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 24, 1938
Citation: 16 N.E.2d 94
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.