*1 626 MEMORANDA. 243 [Yol. People York, Respondent, The of the of State New Appellant.

v. Frank De Storey, R. — — receiving property judgment conviction Crimes stolen affirmed. of 446, People Storey, App. 215 Div. affirmed. v. 6, 22, 1926.) (Argued 1926; decided October October ' Appeal Appellate of the Division judgment from a judicial in the first Supreme department, of the Court a 5, judgment which affirmed of February 1926, entered in the County the of General Sessions of Peace the Court convicting defend- of rendered a verdict York, upon New criminally receiving property. stolen of the of crime ant Harrison for Battle and W. George Gordon Gebhardt appellant. Attorney (Robert C. Taylor H. District Banton,

Joab counsel), respondent. of for of section provisions under the 542

Judgment affirmed Procedure; no opinion. of Criminal the Code of McLaugh- Hiscock, J., Cardozo, Pound, Ch. Concur: Lehman, and JJ. Crane, Andrews lin, v. Company, Star Evans, Respondent, William S. Appellant. — Assembly charge was bribed to absent that Member Libel himself of meeting committee. of from 736, Co., App. Div. affirmed. 216 Evans v. Star 22, 1926.) 5, 1926; (Argued October decided October Appeal Division Appellate the judgment of from a judicial department, in the first Court Supreme of the affirming as modifying and 31, 1926, entered March a upon entered plaintiff in favor of modified a verdict complaint The alleged for libel. in verdict an action falsely its in articles newspapers published that defendant having of Assembly, of a Member defendant, charging the meeting from of himself a absent bribed to been a which he was member. of committee judiciary MEMORANDA. 627 Rep.] N. Y. A. De appellant. J. and William Ford for Clarence Shearn Almy T. Hall and Don B. for Conboy, Henry Martin *2 respondent. affirmed, costs; opinion. with no

Judgment McLaugh- Ch. J., Concur: His Cardozo, Pound, cock, and JJ. lin, Crane, Lehman, Andrews for Earl R. Trustee as Automobile Holmes Dickes, Body Company Company, Respondent, and Walker Indemnity Company, Appellant. v. Globe — — property alleged to recover execution action value to Conversion of wrongfully seized been under execution. have 710, Go., Indemnity App. 216 Div. affirmed. Dickes v. Globe 22, 1926.) 5, (Submitted 1926; decided October October judgment from a of the by permission, Appel- Appeal, in the Supreme judicial Court first Division of the late 1926, unanimously February 24, entered department, in entered upon favor of judgment plaintiff a affirming jury. a Trial Term without a a decision of the court at sheriff the brought against the of action, originally The having been present the defendant county York, of New of an was to recover the value thereafter substituted, to have been chassis, alleged automobile automobile and under execution. by the sheriff wrongfully seized L. Fultz for appellant. David respondent. C. von Glahn for

John opinion. costs; with no affirmed, Judgment McLaugh- J., Concur: Cardozo, Hiscock, Pound, Ch. and JJ. Lehman, Andrews lin, Crane, Philip v. I. Respondent, Schick, Schulman, Herman Appellant. — representations cancel lease action to and Landlord tenant —false representations damages arising lessor. recover and to of from false 846, Schick, App. Div. affirmed. 215 Schulman v. 22, 1926.) 5, 1926; (Submitted October decided October Appeal Division Appellate of the judgment a from judicial department, in the third Court Supreme the of