History
  • No items yet
midpage
Westinghouse, Church, Kerr & Co. v. Long Island Railroad
110 N.E. 1051
| NY | 1915
|
Check Treatment

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN, CARDOZO and POUND, JJ. Dissenting, on the dissenting opinion of INGRAHAM, P.J., below: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., and CHASE, J.

Case Details

Case Name: Westinghouse, Church, Kerr & Co. v. Long Island Railroad
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 16, 1915
Citation: 110 N.E. 1051
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.