Heineman v. City Investing Co.
1925 N.Y. LEXIS 1010
| NY | 1925|
Check TreatmentJudgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CARDOZO, POUND, CRANE, ANDREWS and LEHMAN, JJ. Absent: McLAUGHLIN, J.
Heineman v. City Investing Co.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.