History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hammerston v. Woodwell Holding Corporation
188 N.E. 39
| NY | 1933
|
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: POUND, Ch. J., CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN and CROUCH, JJ. Not sitting: HUBBS, J.






Lead Opinion

no opinion.






Concurrence Opinion

Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Crouch, JJ. Not sitting: Hubbs, J.

Case Details

Case Name: Hammerston v. Woodwell Holding Corporation
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 23, 1933
Citation: 188 N.E. 39
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.