History
  • No items yet
midpage
Opn. No.
|
|
Check Treatment

Hon. John G. McGoldrick Counsel to the Governor

You have asked whether the four public members of the Board of Public Disclosure established by Executive Order No. 10.3, dated July 27, 1981, are "employees" within the scope of section 17 of the Public Officers Law. The Board consists of seven members, of whom three are State officials.

Section 17 of the Public Officers Law provides for the defense and indemnification of State "employees". The term "employee" means "any person holding a position by election, appointment or employment in the service of the state, whether or not compensated" (subd[1] [a]). A member of the Board of Public Disclosure is clearly a person holding a position by appointment. It seems equally clear that the position is "in the service of the state." As the Court of Appeals noted in Rapp v Carey,44 N.Y.2d 157, 165 (1978), the Governor has an interest in requiring that his appointees "abstain from transactions or business associations that potentially conflict with State duties." The very purpose of the Executive Order is to assure the public that the Governor's appointees are serving the State's, not their personal, interests. In assisting the Governor in this respect, the board members are "in the service of the state."

We conclude that the public members of the Board of Public Disclosure are "employees" within the scope of section 17 of the Public Officers Law.

Case Details

Case Name: Opn. No.
Court Name: New York Attorney General Reports
Date Published: Oct 26, 1981
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Att'y Gen.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.