Edward M. Lieberman, Esq. Special Counsel, Town Board of Mamaroneck
You have asked whether the Town of Mamaroneck may by local law appoint a special investigator and empower that investigator, with the consent of the local district attorney, to grant immunity to town employees interviewed in his investigation. The investigation concerns allegations that a particular town employee violated municipally-enacted rules and regulations. None of the allegations, however, charge the employee in question with any crimes. You have indicated that the employee in question is an employee-at-will.
Immunity may only be conferred by operation of the Constitution or as authorized by statute (see People v Dunbar,
"2. . . . may be compelled to give evidence in such a proceeding notwithstanding an assertion of his privilege against self-incrimination if:
"(a) The proceeding is one in which, by express provision of statute, a person conducting or connected therewith is declared a competent authority to confer immunity upon witnesses therein; and
"(b) Such competent authority (i) orders such witness to give the requested evidence notwithstanding his assertion of his privilege against self-incrimination, and (ii) advises him that upon so doing he will receive immunity."
Thus, section 50.20(2)(a), mandates that a statute expressly authorize the granting of immunity by an individual conducting a legal proceeding. In our view, this provision only authorizes the delegation of this power by State law. A local law is legislation enacted by a particular municipality applying solely to that particular county, city, town or village (Municipal Home Rule Law, §
Further, the Legislature has implemented section 50.20(2)(a) by providing that in a criminal proceeding other than a grand jury proceeding, the court may confer immunity only upon an express request to do so by the district attorney (CPL, §
In view of the foregoing, we conclude that a town is not authorized by local law to empower a special investigator to grant immunity to witnesses interviewed in his investigation of a municipal employee-at-will alleged to have violated municipally-enacted rules and regulations.
