HON. WILLIAM H. POWER, JR. District Attorney of St. Lawrence County
This is in response to your letter requesting an opinion of the Attorney General as to whether or not a police agency in your county is required or permitted to retain for its own use a radio seized by said agency in connection with an arrest and subsequent conviction for a violation of section
Section
You state in your letter that the person who was arrested for violating this provision of the Vehicle and Traffic Law has been advised by said police agency that said radio is contraband and cannot be returned to him. You point out that existing statutes make certain things that are seized in connection with arrests for certain specified offenses contraband. For example, you make reference to "drugs, firearms, etc." You go on to state that there does not seem to be any coverage of situations such as the one described in your letter.
Nothing in the Vehicle and Traffic Law makes a radio which is the basis for an arrest under section 397 of such law contraband. Nor does there appear to exist any provision in the law of this State which would make such property subject to forfeiture.
As you point out, and as mentioned above, statutory authority making certain property seized in connection with arrests (and subsequent convictions) is subject to forfeiture. See Penal Law, sections
Absent statutory authority, it is our opinion that a radio seized by the police in connection with an arrest and conviction for a violation of section
