Bradley J. Carr, Esq. Attorney for the Town of Camillus Zoning Board of Appeals and Planning Board
This is in reply to your letter of January 5, 1978, wherein you ask for an opinion as to the proper method for a town to grant an area variance.
Town Law, §
"Where there are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship in the way of carrying out the strict letter of such ordinances, the board of appeals shall have the power in passing upon appeals, to vary or modify the application of any of the regulations or provisions of such ordinance relating to the use, construction or alteration of buildings or structures, or the use of land, so that the spirit of the ordinance shall be observed, public safety and welfare secured and substantial justice done."
As we stated in 1966 Atty Gen [Inf Opns] 63, "it has been held that the above provision of law empowers the board of appeals to pass upon area variances which may be granted on the ground of practical difficulties alone without a showing of unnecessary hardship" (citations omitted).
General Municipal Law, §
"In any * * * town * * * which is located in a county of a county planning agency, which is within the jurisdiction of a metropolitan or regional planning * * * agency, each municipal body which has jurisdiction to adopt or amend zoning regulations * * * or grant variances pursuant to such regulations, shall, before taking final action, * * * refer * * * to such county, metropolitan or regional planning agency.
"(a) any municipal zoning regulation, or any amendment thereof, which would change the district classification of or the regulations applying to real property lying within a distance of five hundred feet from the boundary of any city, village or town * * * and (b) any * * * variance affecting such real property within such distance of five hundred feet." (Emphasis supplied.)
The statute further provides that if the planning agency, after such referral, fails to make a recommendation within thirty days, "the municipal body having jurisdiction to act may do so without such report." In the event that such planning agency either disapproves the proposal, or recommends modification thereof, "the municipal agency having jurisdiction shall not act contrary to such disapproval or recommendation except by a vote of a majority plus one of all the members thereof and after the adoption of a resolution fully setting forth the reasons for such contrary action."
It has been held that the legislative mandate imposed on municipal bodies that they defer taking final action on zoning regulations until after referral to the county, metropolitan or regional planning agency is a condition precedent to such final action by municipalities on the zoning matters specified (Weinstein v. Nicosia,
Town Law, §
In North Shore Beach Property Owners Ass'n. v Town of Brookhaven, 1954, 129 N.Y.S.2d 697, affd
