Carl E. Mooradian, Esq. Corporation Counsel, City of Niagara Falls
You have asked whether a plumbing subcontractor is considered to be "in the employ" of the person he renders service to for purposes of article 4 of the General City Law.
Section
As stated in your letter, the City of Niagara Falls is faced with a situation where a master plumber from another jurisdiction has been working as a subcontractor for a master plumber who holds a certificate from the City of Niagara Falls. The subcontractor does not have a certificate from the City of Niagara Falls. Your question is whether, under the terms of section
Under the statute, only journeyman plumbers in the employ of a certified master plumber need not be certified. We believe the Legislature intended that only employees of the certified master plumber need not be certified. Through this scheme, the public is protected from unskilled plumbing work by the certification required of the employing or master plumber who employs, supervises and controls the journeyman plumber's work activities (see 1981 Op Atty Gen [Inf] 285). A subcontractor by definition is not an employee and the master plumber could not exercise the requisite control over his work. Thus, a subcontractor may not perform plumbing work in the city without certification.
You have also asked, in the event that there is a violation of the General City Law, which party would be in violation, the master plumber from Niagara Falls, or the subcontractor.
Section
We conclude that a subcontractor providing plumbing services to a certified master plumber is not considered to be employed by that master plumber within the meaning of article 4 of the General City Law, and, therefore, must be certified to perform plumbing work in a city.
