History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Dunlap
242 P. 449
| N.M. | 1925
|
Check Treatment

Each of the defendants in the above-entitled causes was convicted under sections 1 and 2, c. 118, Laws of 1923, which, as we have just held in State v. Armstrong, No. 2947, 242 P. 440, not as yet [officially] reported, are violative of section 18, art. 4, of the Constitution of this state. The judgment in each of said causes must therefore be reversed and remanded, with direction to discharge the accused.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Dunlap
Court Name: New Mexico Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 14, 1925
Citation: 242 P. 449
Docket Number: Nos. 2968, 2969, 2979, 2983, 2993, 3040, 3041.
Court Abbreviation: N.M.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.