History
  • No items yet
midpage
Koch v. Bach
35 N.M. 93
| N.M. | 1930
|
Check Treatment

OPINION OF THE COURT
This case is controlled by Koch v. Ziegler, No. 3417,290 P. 321, just decided. Though the pleadings, the evidence, and appellee's position are somewhat different, appellant's contentions are the same, and must be similarly disposed of. Appellant did, in this case, except to certain findings that they were immaterial to the issues. But, if those exceptions meant that a defense of unreasonable discharge had not been pleaded, it was too late after appellant had litigated the issue without objection.

The judgment must be affirmed, and the cause remanded. It is so ordered.

CATRON and SIMMS, JJ., concur.

BICKLEY, C.J., and PARKER, J., did not participate.

Appeal and Error 3CJ § 623 p. 727 n. 99. *Page 94

Case Details

Case Name: Koch v. Bach
Court Name: New Mexico Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 9, 1930
Citation: 35 N.M. 93
Docket Number: No. 3451.
Court Abbreviation: N.M.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.