Hannah v. District Court of Fourth Judicial Dist.
33 N.M. 533
| N.M. | 1928|
Check Treatment[2] Counsel argued that the provisions of the act are unconstitutional, because of a lack of a provision therein for notice and opportunity to be heard by the voters. We hold that there is sufficient provision for notice and hearing contained in the act. Therefore the judgment, in so far as it sustains the demurrer to the petition, is reversed, and the cause remanded. In view of the short time to elapse before the date of the ensuing election, we hereby suspend the rules, if any, providing for rehearing, and *Page 535 direct that the district court overrule the demurrer and proceed forthwith, in accordance with chapter 41, Laws of 1927, and particularly section 223 thereof.
And it is so ordered.
PARKER, C.J., and WATSON, J., concur.
