History
  • No items yet
midpage
Perkins v. Kleinhandler
2 N.J. Super. 596
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
1949
Check Treatment

This matter is before the court on motions made by the defendants Mirror Transportation Company and Charles Harris to amend the Answer heretofore filed by alleging a defense of res judicata and for summary judgment. Briefs were submitted by the respective parties but no proof was furnished of the facts involved, which the court concludes necessary for a proper determination.

The Motion to Amend the Answer is granted with privilege to the plaintiff to file a Reply thereto.

The determination of the Motion for a Summary Judgment will be reserved until the trial of the cause, at which time the motion will be determined when proof of the facts is furnished. *Page 598

Case Details

Case Name: Perkins v. Kleinhandler
Court Name: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Date Published: Feb 14, 1949
Citation: 2 N.J. Super. 596
Court Abbreviation: N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.