History
  • No items yet
midpage
Perkins v. Kleinhandler
2 N.J. Super. 596
| N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. | 1949
|
Check Treatment

This matter is before the court on motions made by the defendants Mirror Transportation Company and Charles Harris to amend the Answer heretofore filed by alleging a defense of res judicata and for summary judgment. Briefs were submitted by the respective parties but no proof was furnished of the facts involved, which the court concludes necessary for a proper determination.

The Motion to Amend the Answer is granted with privilege to the plaintiff to file a Reply thereto.

The determination of the Motion for a Summary Judgment will be reserved until the trial of the cause, at which time the motion will be determined when proof of the facts is furnished. *Page 598

Case Details

Case Name: Perkins v. Kleinhandler
Court Name: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Date Published: Feb 14, 1949
Citation: 2 N.J. Super. 596
Court Abbreviation: N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.