History
  • No items yet
midpage
Herbert v. Corby
1940 N.J. LEXIS 368
N.J.
1940
Check Treatment

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — HEHER, PERSKIE, DEAR, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 6.

For reversal — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, WELLS, JJ. 5. *Page 503

Case Details

Case Name: Herbert v. Corby
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Dec 12, 1940
Citation: 1940 N.J. LEXIS 368
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.