History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Rommel
1925 N.J. LEXIS 327
N.J.
1925
Check Treatment

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — TRENCHARD, KALISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Rommel
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Sep 9, 1925
Citation: 1925 N.J. LEXIS 327
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.