State v. Rommel
1925 N.J. LEXIS 327
| N.J. | 1925|
Check TreatmentThe judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — TRENCHARD, KALISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.