History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brotman v. Traiman
101 N.J.L. 212
| N.J. | 1925
|
Check Treatment

The judges being equally divided on the question whether the judgment should be reversed, the judgment is affirmed solely because of such division, which renders any opinion by the court impossible.

This was an action in the Supreme Court to recover on a broker's commission for the sale of real estate. The case was tried at the Cumberland Circuit before Judge Schimpf and a jury. The trial judge directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and defendant appeals to this court. The judgment under review herein is affirmed by an equally divided court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, JJ. 7.

For reversal — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, MINTURN, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, CLARK, KAYS, JJ. 7. *Page 213

Case Details

Case Name: Brotman v. Traiman
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Feb 19, 1925
Citation: 101 N.J.L. 212
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.