History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kuligowski v. McCullough
103 N.J.L. 700
| N.J. | 1927
|
Check Treatment

The judges being equally divided on the question whether the judgment should be reversed, the judgment is affirmed solely because of such division, which renders any opinion by the court impossible. The judgment under review herein is affirmed by an equally divided court.

For affirmance — TRENCHARD, LLOYD, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 5.

For reversal — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, CAMPBELL, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, JJ. 5.

Case Details

Case Name: Kuligowski v. McCullough
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: May 16, 1927
Citation: 103 N.J.L. 700
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.